|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 20 post(s) |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
119
|
Posted - 2013.04.08 16:14:00 -
[1] - Quote
You ruined my day twice. First was Typhoon, now this. I wish I had bought a ticket to Fanfest. Want to hit your jaw. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
119
|
Posted - 2013.04.08 17:51:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:I think its interesting how a lot of people feel the hyperion NEEDS 5 mids to be able to run an active tank - and at the same time a lot of people seem to think the megathron NEEDS its 7 lows back. That's because Hyper fits active tank, and Throne fits passive. That was an easy question, right?
CCP Rise wrote:As far as the dominix and its old unpredictability, I expect that to be completely preserved. It won't be capable of the highest damage numbers of any battleship now, but it can still fit blasters across the top and run mag stabs along with drone damage amps and heavy drones. Everyone is afraid to say that, but I will. Sentry drones are overpowered. 150 km with 1 omnilink, seriously? If you absolutely need to remove hybrid bonus, go for drone MWD or at least control range bonus. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
120
|
Posted - 2013.04.08 19:00:00 -
[3] - Quote
Anna Verhyldvar wrote:Sinzor Aumer wrote: Sentry drones are overpowered. 150 km with 1 omnilink, seriously?
Yes, what a lovely number it makes in the "Show info" window. Of course, to actually HIT anything out at that range, you'd need several Drone Link Augmentors (4, I think), and since the Dominix has a base targeting range of 70km, you'll need to fit 2 Sensor Boosters with targeting range scripts, or a few signal amplifiers. So, wow, after using 4 high slots and 3 mid slots (or 1 mid and 3-4 lows), you can finally target and hit something at 150km. Oh and then you'll be doing kinetic damage, in fairly low amounts. Whoop de frickin doo. Now explain me how I can perform at least close to that with heavy drones.
Realistically, you only fit 2 drone links in any reasonable fit to get 100 km range, 150 km was to emphasize the absurd. You can switch to better tracking when fighting at close range. On top of that, you can choose damage type. And no, you dont need SeBo, you just assign them.
|

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
120
|
Posted - 2013.04.08 19:17:00 -
[4] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:We hear you guys about the Hyp - I think we're going to have a day to let the feedback keep settling and give us some time to talk it over and we'll give you an update tomorrow.
There's some good suggestions in here, but its not a simple problem so I don't want us committed to anything too quickly.
Thanks for the feedback Yes, Hyper is in trouble but Domi is a complete disaster. Please bring it back. You guys seriously think that it is fun to fit a ship that can only be fit one way? More versatility, damn it, not less!
But if you need some fresh ideas for Hype - here you have it. In fact, take a look at it's picture. See that? The engines! Increase it's max speed like seriously, up to 170, but make it's agility the worst ever. Now you have a brawler that can get in range, wreck havoc, and gtfo. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
122
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 02:26:00 -
[5] - Quote
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:Heavy drones mentioned with the Dominix.
I am concerned that CCP still seem to think anyone really uses them. As well as fighters for carriers. And that's the problem. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
123
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 06:08:00 -
[6] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:The plan here was to fill in both ships' strength. The hyp would provide more power in pure tank and dps by having an extra low for mag stab or TE or resists, and it would sacrifice some utility. The mega would have more utility, again, playing to its strength - and the increased damage from turrets would make up for the lost low somewhat. I see your plan, but people would just fit shield tank on Mega and call it a day. As for me, I dont see anthing criminal in that. Versatility is good I say. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
123
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 06:25:00 -
[7] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:One last thing to mention: Personally, I really think sentry drones should move some, even if its only to return to bay. We need to talk some more about this internally and look at ways it can actually be implemented, but a change to this effect could have a very positive impact on the Dominix and I don't think its a very unrealistic goal. Are you ******* kidding me? You've just suggested buffing sentries? Sentry drones is the only weapon system that outperforms it's capital counterpart (fighters) and is on par with super-capital one (fighter-bombers). Just unban them on supers and you'll see those slowcats on steroids everywhere. Heavy drones? What's that? Never heard. The only thing sentry drones need is a revamped interface.
If you suggestion goes live, I'd stop using them. I dont play broken toys, no matter if those are broken to be useless or to be OP. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
123
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 06:51:00 -
[8] - Quote
Traxle wrote:CCP Rise wrote: Moving Sentries
I completely agree! It would be nice if they were permanently orbiting our ship, unable to leave that flight pattern but still hit stuff. I'm not sure what the tracking ramifications of that would be though. or perhaps only allow them to move when they are recalled to the ship. Either way, big Plus for me on that Oh yeah, duct tape them to your ship! Under your shilds. And armor! We live in a dangerous world you know, we dont want our drones to explode, right? Oh wait... They are turrets now! Way to go CCP, make all weapon systems the same. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
123
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 11:11:00 -
[9] - Quote
Akirei Scytale wrote:What I want to see is Gallente having a viable option for fleets. It would have to be either the Megathron or Hyperion, as drones to not mesh well with fleets. Drones do mesh excellent with fleets. Your alliance has a program to help them field as many slowcats as possible. You better learn that really quick, or Daddy PL would punish you! |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
123
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 11:38:00 -
[10] - Quote
CCP Rise wrote:Hi again Gallente friends!
We've just had a meeting with the balance team to weigh all your feedback and go over our options for this ship line. We have come up with some new solutions which I think you will be happy about.
Look for an update with the new versions in the next day or two, we are going to spend some time tuning them so that we are less likely to have to make even more changes afterwards.
Thanks again for the input! You better bring back my versatile Dominix, or I'll hit your jaw right through the monitor. Seriously, sentry drones are too strong compared to other drone types. No need to emphasize their strength even futher. |
|

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
123
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 12:21:00 -
[11] - Quote
Benjamin Hamburg wrote:Seriously, nobody care about trakcing and drone optimal since drones boat are rarely use in fleet, small gang and PVE (drone get aggro now). JFC! Where do you all dwell dudes, in Dumbland? SENTRY DRONES ARE USED IN LARGE FLEET PVP!!! Those are called slowcats! The carriers with sentries, you know! Not with fighter - their intended weapon - but sentries! And I use them in PVE, they perform super good despite some AI change and stuff. Better than Machariel I'd say. I know that, cause I used to fly it as well. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
123
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 12:30:00 -
[12] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Domis have 3 sets of sentries. Slowcats have innumerably more. Domis move. Slowcats do not. Domis have a tenth of the EHP and don't do as well repping each other.
Let me teach you about sentry drones in fleet pvp. Then stop moving your Domi and dont forget to scoop them drones before you warp. EHP and reps are irrelevant. Now please, gosu, explain how can I use heavy drones for... well at least for something? |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
123
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 12:37:00 -
[13] - Quote
Afandi wrote:Keep carriers out of the equation, we are talking about droneboat battleships, mkay? I can't think of a single case when droneboat battleships had been used in a fleet. Bloody hell! You see that PL dude down here? They used those Navy Domis, with sentry drones. You warp in position, you mocro-jump off, you deploy drones, you assign them. When yellowboxed, switch on Target Breaker and GTFO. What do you say now? I was in a fleet of sentry cruisers. Wait what? Yeah, just what you've heard. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
123
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 12:41:00 -
[14] - Quote
Zloco Crendraven wrote:The only problem is that fleets need moving, that is the biggest problem with drone boats, sentries dont follow.
Maybe it is time for CCP to look into it. No! You want moving drones - use heavies, period. You want range with sentries - then sit still in place or loose them. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
124
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 13:00:00 -
[15] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Just "stop moving your domi" isn't really good advice. There are plenty of reasons why you should, would or have to move. EHP is very relevant for any BS platform, especially one that is immobile as you suggest!
Heavy drones are more useful in smaller scale battles where the enemies are not spread out or at long ranges. Warping on top of people with short range BS is useful but sentries are better in big battles when you don't need to worry about smaller ships. Yes, and unlike slowcats it actually CAN move if you choose to. Want to save drones? Sit still. Want to move - loose drones. It's fair. What is NOT fair is that even capital-sized drones are inferior to sentries. Have you ever seen a dread with BS-sized guns? And heavy drones for close range? No, sir. Use gardes. Enemy pulled the range? Switch to bouncers. The only case you want heavies - is when you dont have a spare flight in your bay.
Dez Affinity wrote:I'm not saying that 150km with 600 dps and uber tracking isn't good. It is great. It's not fun but it's statistically great. On paper sentry domi fleets will be quite good, overpowered even. For a short while. Here, finally! At least someone competent finally acknowledged sentries ~could~ be overpowered. If you dudes spent more time doing PVP instead of super-blobbing, you'd already had a solid working doctrine. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
124
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 13:06:00 -
[16] - Quote
MukkBarovian wrote:Dominix ... You guys are complaining about a 50% optimal range and tracking bonus! WHATS WRONG WITH YOU? Its going to be overpowered. That's exactly the reason why I'm complaining. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
124
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 13:17:00 -
[17] - Quote
Roime wrote:But why aren't sentry Domis OP now? You can get the same range and tracking currently. They are. I switched from Machariel to a Domi, though a navy one, for running missions. A little boring? Yes, indeed. Cheap and efficient? You bet it. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
124
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 13:25:00 -
[18] - Quote
Zloco Crendraven wrote:Nah drone boats in large scale pvp sux! Other ships are much more better only because of 1 reason, u cannot move if u get sentries out. Do you have reading comprehension problems? Once again: you CAN move, if you chose to. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
124
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 13:30:00 -
[19] - Quote
Dez Affinity wrote:Sinzor Aumer wrote: Here, finally! At least someone competent finally acknowledged sentries ~could~ be overpowered. If you dudes spent more time doing PVP instead of super-blobbing, you'd already had a solid working doctrine.
We've already done a Navy Domi Sentry fleet and this was before these changes. So uh. What are you talking about? I know you did. Was it success? If yes - why dont we see that doctrine anymore? If not - why dont you improve that? |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
124
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 13:55:00 -
[20] - Quote
Gary Goat wrote:Dominix: The Ugly The domi has always been a versatile boat and maybe the most versatile ship in the entire game. You never really knew how it was going to be fit until you engaged it which was its saving grace really, it also had great adaptability in the ever changing meta of eve online. The geddon has now taken away its role as a neuting drone boat (one of its best roles for small gangs) and the loss of the hybrid bonus has killed it in PVE and large fleets (although it was never very good in fleets anyway). The new domi looks like a bigger myrmidon without the tanking bonus which makes the myrmidon good. Maybe it should be the ship with that rep bonus instead of the hyp? Yes I miss that versatility and I want it back badly. But there once was another, even more versatile Battleship. Typhoon was it's name, let it rest in peace. And Dominix is useless in large fleets? Dear god, dont make me start again! It was bad before they introduced drone damage amplifiers. Now it's fine. After this change it'd become ******* overpowered. And when they finally realize that - after 3 years of complaints, mind you - they'll stomp on it and nerf it to the ground. But, alas, all it's former roles would be busy with Geddons and other overlords. So it'd become just another useless peace of space potato. A bustard offspring of Federation. I'm mad. |
|

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
124
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 14:01:00 -
[21] - Quote
Marxzo Andoun wrote:The Domi has gained: Freeing up mid-slots from OTLs we used to use for this role because.... we needed the midslots for tackle as a sniper... no wait. we needed the midslots for more shield tank as a sniper... hmm, that's not right. Try EWAR. I've heard it helps. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
124
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 14:07:00 -
[22] - Quote
Omnathious Deninard wrote:The versatility is not gone. Quit being narrow minded. Narrow minded is not my name. Every time CCP cuts a feature, people say - hey, there is some more left, it's not that bad! Every freaking time! Now who is norrow-minded? |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
124
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 14:21:00 -
[23] - Quote
Marxzo Andoun wrote:Sinzor Aumer wrote:Dominix... Try EWAR. I've heard it helps. Because when we are sniping with the new drone range bonus, EWAR modules will be in range too right? I must have missed that EWAR range bonus... If you're at your sniping range, you dont need to worry of anything. Just watch your enemy burn. Or you can fit SeBo. You didnt need those mids anyway, right?
In fact I must admit that versatility is not completely gone. It reduced, and... shifted. From highs to mids. But my other point stands just right. Sentry drones are really strong now. And making a sentry-bonused ship means making overpowed ship. Which is bad. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
125
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 14:27:00 -
[24] - Quote
Sentry Dominix doesnt need any help, it's fine. Heavy-drones Dominix need some help desperately. Just put drone MWD bonus on it, and call it a day. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
125
|
Posted - 2013.04.09 14:44:00 -
[25] - Quote
Sentamon wrote:I'm digging the proposed Domi. 
Looks like I did as well.  But heavy drones are still inferior. |

Sinzor Aumer
Atlas Research Group Aerodyne Collective
126
|
Posted - 2013.04.10 04:50:00 -
[26] - Quote
Askulf Joringer wrote:IceDe4d wrote:PS: PLS FIX ASTARTE !!! I second this, Command ships are FAR FAR FAR more broke than any of the T1 BS were. After these changes, this is no more! :troll: But indeed, when Fozzie (or was it Itterbium?) posted the results of their preliminary investigation, I figured they'll only rework Typhoon - because Fozzie hates split weapons. I clearly remember that Domi was mentioned as being "fine", so I expected just minor tweaks. And suddenly - THIS! ...why? |
|
|
|